| 1 |
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:02:44 +0200 |
| 2 |
Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Among other information the Gentoo page at DistroWatch [1] displays a |
| 5 |
> table on about 200 selected packages [2] and how up to date Gentoo is |
| 6 |
> per package. I assume that DistroWatch is still one of the first places |
| 7 |
> people go to get a feeling for a Distro they heard about, besides |
| 8 |
> Wikpedia and ${distro}.org. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The freshness of these 200 packages have influence on how people |
| 11 |
> perceive Gentoo on DistroWatch. While the tree as a whole is what we |
| 12 |
> should keep as up to date as possible keeping these 200 packages (list |
| 13 |
> further down) up to date can therefore be of particular importance. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Personally I don't see how gaming the system helps us in any way. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Also, screw DW. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. |
| 24 |
gcc-porting, |
| 25 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives