| 1 |
Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> It mixes up diffent things to one and just introduces new |
| 5 |
> problems instead of solving anything. I could live with that, |
| 6 |
> if it's for supporting different ABIs, but it obviously isn't. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
No? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> gtk1 and gtk2 are completely different packages, they're not |
| 12 |
> compatible. So why should they be one package ? Just because |
| 13 |
> they share some ideas and the name ?! |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Because gtk-2.xx is originated from gtk+-1.2.xx and you still have a |
| 16 |
common set of widget API ? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> For example, there are lots of packages requiring gtk1, other |
| 20 |
> gtk2. As long as dependencies don't cope the slot cleanly, |
| 21 |
> slotting is utterly useless. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
gtk-1 is deprecated, it will disappear sooner or later. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Luca Barbato |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 30 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives