Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Richard Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Watch out for license changes to GPL-3.
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:22:27
Message-Id: 469129CF.9040301@thefreemanclan.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Watch out for license changes to GPL-3. by Seemant Kulleen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Seemant Kulleen wrote:
5 > If you can really show some way that GPL3 provides a compelling case
6 > to move to it, then we can start talking about that.
7 >
8
9 I wasn't aware that gentoo practiced copyright assignment. You might
10 want to make the disclaimers clear - if somebody submits a patch on
11 bugzilla and doesn't expressly assign copyright they would legally
12 retain it unless it were a clear condition of using the site. Also, it
13 would help avoid people submitting patches that aren't
14 GPL-2-only-compatible from other projects. But then again, I'm not a
15 lawyer... :)
16
17 I guess one reason to move would be that it is the goal of the FSF for
18 this to become the "default" GPL. So, if there was a compelling case
19 for adopting the GPL at all (one presumes there was since we're GPL
20 currently), then there is a case for migrating to GPL v3 by that virtue
21 alone. Does that mean that we HAVE to? Certainly not.
22
23 I'd ask the question why we're GPL at all? If the reason is because we
24 generally agree with the principles of free software and copyleft, then
25 the GPL v3 is only an improvement over the GPL. If we don't really like
26 copyleft as an organization then it would make more sense to just adopt
27 BSD, rather than stick with a copyleft license that just has a few
28 loopholes in it.
29
30 In terms of pros/cons with GPLv2 you'd have compatibility with GPL3 and
31 GPL2+ licenses, as well as the the Affero GPL. There is of course the
32 closing of the tivoization loophole, and that can be considered a pro or
33 a con depending on your personal beliefs. However, if you really are
34 pro-tivoization, then why use the GPL at all?
35
36 Oh, there exists another option - we could also relicense as GPL2 or 3 -
37 that gets rid of the "what if it changes to something bad" issue while
38 allowing others to adopt the code under either license.
39 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
40 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
41 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
42
43 iD8DBQFGkSnKG4/rWKZmVWkRApvIAJ98Oj9+pNvRnHXYVeNAElNQ8dUeYwCfeQNN
44 s0QRFW/n1ZNhZm1RabgNaQk=
45 =w0HP
46 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachments

File name MIME type
smime.p7s application/x-pkcs7-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Watch out for license changes to GPL-3. Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>