| 1 |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:59:02PM -0700, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:25:57 +0000 |
| 3 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > no idea what you mean by "override", but here's a crazy idea ... ask |
| 6 |
> > upstream to fix the issues. for example, we just reported executable |
| 7 |
> > stacks with the ut2004 game and Ryan of epicgames was so kind as to |
| 8 |
> > fix it up for us. some upstream peeps dont even know about these sort |
| 9 |
> > of things until you point them out. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Not to redirect the thread, but can someone point me to stuff on |
| 12 |
> executable stacks (what they are and the background info on the |
| 13 |
> warnings in portage)? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
my gnu stack docs are actually complete: |
| 16 |
http://hardened.gentoo.org/gnu-stack.xml |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> If these are anywhere near critical, then I think a lot of us non-x86 |
| 19 |
> arch monkeys have a lot of work on our hands. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
gnu-stack tends to be broken for everyone, not just x86 or !x86 |
| 22 |
-mike |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives