| 1 |
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 22:23:44 +0000 |
| 2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Jimi Huotari wrote: |
| 5 |
> > # Jimi Huotari <chiitoo@g.o> (2020-08-04) |
| 6 |
> > # No consumers since 2015, and no known stand-alone use. |
| 7 |
> > # Removal in 30 days. |
| 8 |
> > dev-libs/liboobs |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Wut - isn't that a really poor reason to remove from the tree? :\ |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Why not just keep it unless there is an actual technical problem? |
| 13 |
> (Security, maintainability, etc.) If there is, then please mention it. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> //Peter |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'd certainly be fine with this, and 'app-admin/system-tools-backends', |
| 20 |
which is next on my list to go, to be assigned to maintainer-wanted |
| 21 |
instead of being removed. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I've sort of inherited these, but have no use for them, and nothing else |
| 24 |
depends on them. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
The mask is not live yet, so any advice how to move along will be appreciated. :] |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
See also: |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/542846 |
| 31 |
- https://bugs.gentoo.org/667654 |
| 32 |
- https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/16989 |
Archives