1 |
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 23:00:47 +0100 |
2 |
Alfredo Tupone <tupone@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I would like to revive the Ada support in gentoo. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> One ada compiler is produced by AdaCore and is provided in three |
7 |
> versions, in the order starting from the best supported : |
8 |
> |
9 |
> 1) GnatPro, available with a contract support. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> 2) Gnat-GPL that can only build GPL-3 product |
12 |
> |
13 |
> 3) The gnat included in the gcc tree that is GPL-3 with exception. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Gnat-GPL is very like the gnat in the gcc-tree so it can be built in |
16 |
> the same way of sys-devel/gcc |
17 |
> |
18 |
> To be compiled from source the gcc compiler needs a C, C++, and Ada |
19 |
> Compiler. I will provide one with the gnat-gpl-bin tar that could be |
20 |
> installed under /opt . When the gcc is properly compiled we don't need |
21 |
> it any more. |
22 |
|
23 |
Do I correctly understand that this is also true for gnat-gpl? Is there |
24 |
any Ada compiler that could be used to bootstrap Ada on platforms that |
25 |
lack prebuilt binaries? |
26 |
|
27 |
> I would like to start including, in the gentoo tree, GNAT-GPL |
28 |
> built in the same way as sys-devel-gcc and selectable with gcc-config |
29 |
|
30 |
1. Does this mean that GNAT-GPL build will include building a C |
31 |
compiler? If yes, will the C compiler be installed? |
32 |
|
33 |
2. Will it be possible to combine GNAT-GPL with a different version of |
34 |
regular gcc C/C++ compilers? |
35 |
|
36 |
> As for instance gnat-gpl-2014 is based on gcc-4.7.4 they cannot coexist |
37 |
> and gnat-gpl-2014 will block sys-devel/gcc-4.7.4 |
38 |
|
39 |
Block the whole sys-devel/ or just sys-devel/gcc[ada]? |
40 |
|
41 |
> As a reference I have my overlay on https://github.com/atupone/overlay |
42 |
> and a pull request at https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/3186 |
43 |
> |
44 |
> To start I need to change the toolchain.eclass |
45 |
> |
46 |
> - tc_version_is_at_least 4.7 && IUSE+=" go" |
47 |
> + tc_version_is_at_least 4.7 && IUSE+=" go ada" |
48 |
> |
49 |
> - # We do NOT want 'ADA support' in here! |
50 |
> - # is_ada && GCC_LANG+=",ada" |
51 |
> + # We do want 'ADA support' here! |
52 |
> + is_ada && GCC_LANG+=",ada" |
53 |
> |
54 |
> - for x in cpp gcc g++ c++ gcov g77 gcj gcjh gfortran gccgo ; do |
55 |
> + for x in cpp gcc g++ c++ gcov g77 gcj gcjh gfortran gccgo gnatbind; do |
56 |
> |
57 |
> Thats all for that. |
58 |
> |
59 |
> Then, to not change the behaviour of the gcc-compiler, we could mask the |
60 |
> ada use flag for sys-devel/gcc, at least temporarily |
61 |
> |
62 |
> --------------------- |
63 |
> |
64 |
> I would like to have comments on that, particularly because: |
65 |
> a) it is going to add a use flag to sys-devel/gcc that will bring gcc |
66 |
> to be rebuilt on most system, |
67 |
|
68 |
That's a minor problem. Toolchain people do this on us all the time, |
69 |
so... |
70 |
|
71 |
> b) the gnat-gpl, if selected with gcc-config, can be used to recompile |
72 |
> all the system, and maybe is not so good ? |
73 |
|
74 |
I don't really understand what you mean here. But it's probably related |
75 |
to the questions I asked above. |
76 |
|
77 |
-- |
78 |
Best regards, |
79 |
Michał Górny |
80 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |