| 1 |
On 06/29/14 17:33, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/29/2014 10:23 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sunday 29 June 2014 17:03:52 Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100 |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>>> It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker |
| 9 |
>>>>> but I most likely did it because I was asked to mask >=lxc-1.0.0 by |
| 10 |
>>>>> the virtualization team (and Diego (flameeyes). And docker depends on |
| 11 |
>>>>> lxc-1.0.0 according to the ebuild. But now that you have unmasked |
| 12 |
>>>>> docker, i think the deptree will be broken since lxc is still masked. |
| 13 |
>>>> |
| 14 |
>>>> Repoman is monitored; therefore, someone from the QA team or so has |
| 15 |
>>>> probably masked Docker. Given that broken dependency tree again it is |
| 16 |
>>>> likely to happen again. So, please set it up a satisfiable state. :) |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> AutoRepoman :) |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> So that was me fixing the depgraph, taking the easy way out of adding an |
| 21 |
>>> unsatisfiable package to an existing related package.mask. |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>> If people can't be bothered to even run repoman full or commit without |
| 24 |
>>> --force they'll get annoyed by my corrections - maybe it has an educational |
| 25 |
>>> effect ;) |
| 26 |
>>> |
| 27 |
>>> Have fun, |
| 28 |
>>> |
| 29 |
>>> Patrick |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> Tadaah: |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> dependency.bad 22 |
| 34 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 35 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 36 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 37 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 38 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 39 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 40 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 41 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd) ['>=app- |
| 42 |
>> emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 43 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 44 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 45 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 46 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde/systemd) ['>=app- |
| 47 |
>> emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 48 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 49 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 50 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 51 |
>> ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 52 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 53 |
>> ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 54 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 55 |
>> ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 56 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.0.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 57 |
>> ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 58 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 59 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 60 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 61 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 62 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 63 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 64 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 65 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome/systemd) ['>=app- |
| 66 |
>> emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 67 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 68 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 69 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 70 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde/systemd) ['>=app- |
| 71 |
>> emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 72 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 73 |
>> ~amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 74 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 75 |
>> ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 76 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 77 |
>> ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 78 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 79 |
>> ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 80 |
>> app-emulation/docker/docker-1.0.1.ebuild: RDEPEND: |
| 81 |
>> ~amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['>=app-emulation/lxc-1.0'] |
| 82 |
>> |
| 83 |
>> |
| 84 |
> |
| 85 |
> Yeah, lets wait for Greg or Tianon to reply and if docker+lxc works for |
| 86 |
> them we can unmask lxc. |
| 87 |
> |
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
Well, since apparently no one cares about having satisfiable |
| 90 |
dependencies I just unmasked lxc so that the already-unmasked docker is |
| 91 |
happy. |
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
I have no idea why people enjoy breaking things so much, but at least it |
| 94 |
won't get boring for me! |
Archives