| 1 |
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Hi, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>Currently the files that accompany our release files (ISO images, |
| 6 |
>stages) are named in the following scheme: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> *.asc for GPG signatures |
| 9 |
> *.md5 for MD5 sums |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>while the files that accompany our portage snapshots are named: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> *.gpgsig for GPG signatures |
| 14 |
> *.md5sum for MD5 sums |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>I suggest we unify the naming scheme to the one currently in use by our |
| 17 |
>release files to avoid unnecessary confusion amongst our end-users - |
| 18 |
>unless of course there is a good reason for having different naming |
| 19 |
>schemes for release files and portage snapshots? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>Sincerely, |
| 22 |
>Brix |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
Don't you think its a bit trival, but on the other hand, yes i agree |
| 26 |
that unifying them wouldnt be a bad thing, its just a matter of getting |
| 27 |
it done, and updating the documentation to reflect the changes (minor |
| 28 |
changes :-P) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I say 'Do it.' |
| 31 |
---------------------------- |
| 32 |
Andrew Muraco |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives