| 1 |
Found the answer of #gentoo-bugs but would have preferred to find it here... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I was told that somebody broke the script that automatically creates the |
| 4 |
nightly (not weekly as I guessed - should have researched first) and that it |
| 5 |
should be fixed soon. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I've given the original enquirer a copy of the net-misc/openssh subtree for |
| 8 |
the time being... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Saturday 20 September 2003 09:02, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 11 |
> That's what another user recommended but looking at the script shows that |
| 12 |
> it just finds the latest snapshot (portage-20030914.tar.bz2 in this case), |
| 13 |
> extracts it locally at then rsyncs against the local copy. That latest copy |
| 14 |
> is now 6 days old. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> On Saturday 20 September 2003 06:35, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 17 |
> > emerge webrsync should fix him right up. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 11:15, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 20 |
> > > Hello all, |
| 21 |
> > > |
| 22 |
> > > There's a person on gentoo-user questioning where he can get a portage |
| 23 |
> > > snapshot later than portage-20030914.tar.bz2 as he wants to update |
| 24 |
> > > openssh but can't emerge sync due to his firewall. |
| 25 |
> > > |
| 26 |
> > > How are the snapshots generated? Automatically once a week? Maybe a |
| 27 |
> > > snapshot should be manually generated whenever a security fix is added |
| 28 |
> > > to portage to cater for this situation? |
| 29 |
> > > |
| 30 |
> > > Regards, |
| 31 |
> > > Jason |
| 32 |
> > > |
| 33 |
> > > -- |
| 34 |
> > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> -- |
| 37 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives