| 1 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 2 |
> Neither of the gits gentoo has seems very split, |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I was referring to git in Debian here: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Package: git-core |
| 7 |
Binary: git-core, git-doc, git-arch, git-cvs, git-svn, |
| 8 |
git-email, git-daemon-run, git-gui, gitk, gitweb |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> texlive with (http://www.tug.org/texlive/) seems to be missing from this list. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> $ eix -H http://www.tug.org/texlive/ | tail -n 1 |
| 14 |
> Found 79 matches. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I suspect you used grep (or whatever) to construct your data, instead of using |
| 17 |
> the package manager or a tool that knows how to extract the data available in |
| 18 |
> packages (and eclasses). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
True, grep and friends. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> I'm not sure which 3 cases you mean. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I was referring to what I said before, in summary: |
| 26 |
1) non-unique homepages |
| 27 |
2) extra work for split packages |
| 28 |
3) extra work for category mapping |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> I did not argue for a data format nor for a specific language nor coding style |
| 32 |
> nor anything that seems to match what you are saying here; I only spoke about |
| 33 |
> how to populate the CPE database. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I understood you wanted to replace the XML colection with mapping code. |
| 36 |
I got you wrong then. I agree that combining automated fill of the |
| 37 |
database with manual can speed things up a lot. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Sebastian |
Archives