Archives
Archives
| From: | "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union | ||
| Date: | Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:40:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 44533441.1040901@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union by Ryan Phillips |
||
| 1 | Ryan Phillips wrote: |
| 2 | > Stable and unstable keywords are a hack on top of a version control |
| 3 | > system. We wouldn't have them if gentoo used an SCM that supports true |
| 4 | > branches. There would be no need. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Umm, I'm not an ebuild dev, but how would users mix stable and unstable |
| 7 | packages in such a case? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Cheers, |
| 10 | -jkt |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo: State of the Union | Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> |