| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I must have read the thread incorrectly at some point, then. I thought the |
| 5 |
purpose of Gentoo (co-)owning the copyright was the prevent the creator from |
| 6 |
making it proprietary. What exactly does it achive to have Gentoo (co-)own |
| 7 |
copyrights on them? I have no objection to the idea, but I see no actual |
| 8 |
*reason* why it should be required... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Thursday 21 August 2003 06:00 pm, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 11 |
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:49:25PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote: |
| 12 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 13 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Even if the owner were to change the license, they could not change it on |
| 16 |
> > ebuilds already released under the GPL. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I'm aware, thank you. I don't need to have the basics of copyright law |
| 19 |
> explained to me. |
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Luke-Jr |
| 22 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 23 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQE/RWVHZl/BHdU+lYMRApjkAJ9CBki4BH5q3wABFpoNN5fxe3C+rQCcDP9k |
| 28 |
hScPDIpYKARrj7oGU74ck8s= |
| 29 |
=FlRV |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives