| 1 |
On 10/01/2016 12:45 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:12:26 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand: |
| 3 |
>> On 10/01/2016 12:09 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016, 00:01:54 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand: |
| 5 |
>>>>> This *will* break the following ebuilds: |
| 6 |
>>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>>> www-apps/bugzilla-4.4.12 |
| 8 |
>>>>> www-apps/bugzilla-5.0.3 |
| 9 |
>>>>> www-apache/mod_limitipconn-0.24-r2 |
| 10 |
>>>>> www-apache/mod_nss-1.0.12-r1 |
| 11 |
>>>>> app-eselect/eselect-php-0.9.1 |
| 12 |
>>>>> net-analyzer/pnp4nagios-0.6.25-r3 |
| 13 |
>>>>> net-analyzer/icinga2-2.4.10-r1 |
| 14 |
>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>> Several of these ebuilds are in stable, so I strongly oppose any action |
| 16 |
>>>> that breaks existing ebuilds. |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> Right. So instead I'll ad a big fat and ugly ewarn message, but I'll do |
| 19 |
>>> that right now. :) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>> As its not user-breaking/affecting, I believe ewarn is wrong as well. |
| 22 |
>> Should just open bug reports towards the affected packages with a tracker |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I agree that what we really need here is eqawarn ... |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> However I *want* the message to be loud and obnoxious. |
| 27 |
> We need eblinkwarn ... :o) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I don't see why users should be bothered with maintainer mistakes that |
| 31 |
doesn't affect them (in this particular circumstance) |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 36 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 37 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives