| 1 |
On 11 August 2016 at 04:22, NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Looks to me like we can't edit that eclass in place, so if we are to |
| 3 |
> keep it, we should probably revbump it, update the -r1 to L10N, and add |
| 4 |
> a deprecation warning to the old eclass to help maintainers migrate over. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Any opinions? I'd be happy work on the revbump for the eclass if we |
| 7 |
> decide to go that route. CC'ing yngwin since it is his eclass. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Feel free to revbump it and change it to whatever works for current needs. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Cheers, |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 15 |
Gentoo developer |
Archives