| 1 |
On 05/05/2016 08:59 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016, 09:53:10 schrieb Patrick Lauer: |
| 3 |
> > On 05/05/2016 09:44 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD |
| 6 |
> >>> people could feel better: except that we can't actually fix the core |
| 7 |
> >>> 'issue' without making lots of other people very sad. |
| 8 |
> >>> |
| 9 |
> >>> |
| 10 |
> >>> Y'all have too much free time ... ;) |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> I'm inclined to say, that provided there *is* someone doing it .. let |
| 13 |
> >> them be. Whatever the motives. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> > This ignores the externalized cost for potentially thousands of users |
| 16 |
> > that have to fix stuff because it was actively broken. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> So how many custom init scripts have you deployed that you can't fix |
| 20 |
> with a |
| 21 |
> single Rex command? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
I like the naive assumption that I only have one central deployment :) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
To be honest, I don't know, because I shouldn't have to care ... but |
| 26 |
what's a few hours of changing stuff between friends, especially when it |
| 27 |
doesn't add any features. |
Archives