Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: POSIX capability in Gentoo
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:43:36
Message-Id: 20110802183918.5ef5252c@googlemail.com
1 On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:36:12 -0400
2 Jonathan Callen <abcd@g.o> wrote:
3 > That statement needs one more qualification: "and doesn't use
4 > portage". Portage will (by default) remove files on uninstall even if
5 > they *do not* match the checksum recorded in the vdb. This implies
6 > that most people will *not* see any issues due to something other
7 > than the package manager modifying the files behind the package
8 > manager's back.
9
10 Ugh, seriously? When did that happen? That's a massive change to how
11 VDB is supposed to work.
12
13 Maybe we need to spec VDB after all to avoid that kind of nonsense.
14
15 --
16 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: POSIX capability in Gentoo Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: POSIX capability in Gentoo Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>