| 1 |
begin quote |
| 2 |
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:50:57 -0800 |
| 3 |
Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@××××××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 6 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Why not have the openssl-0.9.7 binary package include the 0.9.6 |
| 9 |
> library? This is what results when you update openssl 0.9.6 to 0.9.7 |
| 10 |
> using the latest ebuilds. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
You're solving the wrong problem. Thats for -forwards- compability. But |
| 13 |
how should deptracking be done on a case where the system you install |
| 14 |
the binary on doesnt have a "new" enough library, so the case is "it |
| 15 |
would build against it perfectly" but the runtime version is stricter? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
//Spider |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
begin .signature |
| 22 |
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! |
| 23 |
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. |
| 24 |
end |
Archives