Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ulm@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 22:33:29
Message-Id: 20150107223319.GA8410@linux1
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages by Mike Pagano
1 On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:48:01PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
2 > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:08:21PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
3 > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
4 > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
5 > > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
6 > > > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
7 > > > > > > All,
8 > > > William,
9 > > >
10 > > > At what point do we not care about users who have not upgraded and will
11 > > > miss this security message?
12 > >
13 > > I would say that's more up to you as the maintainer, but put something
14 > > to the affect in the mask comment.
15 > >
16 > > # This mask will be removed <whenever>
17 > >
18 > > William
19 > >
20 >
21 > Fair enough. This question is to anyone that supports users and works on
22 > bugs. Especially the portage devs. At what point do you say to a user
23 > that their system is so old that they really need to upgrade?
24 >
25 > 2 years, 1 year, < 1 year? Maybe that's a good thing to state in documentation.
26
27 We already have a distro policy about this. I put ulm on this email
28 specifically, because he knows where the link is, and I don't right now.
29
30 Basically, at the distro level, anything over a year old is fair game to
31 be dropped.
32
33 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>