1 |
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:48:01PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:08:21PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > > All, |
8 |
> > > William, |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > At what point do we not care about users who have not upgraded and will |
11 |
> > > miss this security message? |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > I would say that's more up to you as the maintainer, but put something |
14 |
> > to the affect in the mask comment. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > # This mask will be removed <whenever> |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > William |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Fair enough. This question is to anyone that supports users and works on |
22 |
> bugs. Especially the portage devs. At what point do you say to a user |
23 |
> that their system is so old that they really need to upgrade? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> 2 years, 1 year, < 1 year? Maybe that's a good thing to state in documentation. |
26 |
|
27 |
We already have a distro policy about this. I put ulm on this email |
28 |
specifically, because he knows where the link is, and I don't right now. |
29 |
|
30 |
Basically, at the distro level, anything over a year old is fair game to |
31 |
be dropped. |
32 |
|
33 |
William |