Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] perl/openssl circular dep, possible solution (python/perl/db devs please read) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:51:42 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200506141748.50705.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] perl/openssl circular dep, possible solution (python/perl/db devs please read) by Paul de Vrieze |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 14 June 2005 05:32 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 | > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it |
| 3 | > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, as |
| 4 | > building does not depend on portage being there. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | it was added when `portageq` didnt exist everywhere so we had to make sure the |
| 7 | portage on the system ran a new-enough version |
| 8 | |
| 9 | we can drop it now if it'll break this circular DEPEND |
| 10 | -mike |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] perl/openssl circular dep, possible solution (python/perl/db devs please read) | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> |