Archives
Archives
| From: | "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Version Naming Clarification | ||
| Date: | Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:40:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070607203321.GA16428@boostbox.mill1.nb.home.nl | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Version Naming Clarification by Stephen Bennett |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:31:44PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 2 | > On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:42:45 +0200 |
| 3 | > Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > > Thing is: if you see sys-fs/ntfs-3g, is that an atom or a CPV? You |
| 6 | > > don't know unless you actually check the tree. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Is there any place in the tree where a dep atom and a CPV are both |
| 9 | > accepted? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | An ebuild's PROVIDE list. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | > Should there be? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Probably not. |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Version Naming Clarification | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Version Naming Clarification | Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> |