Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Eric Sammer <eric@××××××××××××.com>
To: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 05:55:52
Message-Id: 3F163A59.9060505@ineoconcepts.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] request for comments: move to stable by Seemant Kulleen
1 Seemant Kulleen wrote:
2 > We'd like to receive comments (the negative ones, especially) for
3 > moving gcc-3.2.3-r1, glibc-2.3.2-r1 and binutils-2.14.90.0.2 from
4 > ~arch to arch (at least for x86 platform).
5
6 These packages are working great for me (i.e. compile other stuff fine)
7 on the following servers (heavy production):
8
9 ibm e-server x205 (P4 2.xGhz) CFLAGS="-mcpu=pentium3 -O3 -pipe"
10
11 amd duron 900mhz CFLAGS="-march=athlon -O3 -ffast-math
12 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe"
13
14 P3 600mhz CFLAGS="-mcpu=pentium3 -O3 -pipe"
15
16 I also have a few other gentoo servers but they are all "stable."
17
18 A few gentoo laptops (assorted hardware including laptops) are ~x86 and
19 show no problems. If all goes well, I will soon have at least one Sun
20 220R (or maybe a 420) to test on as well (and by "test," I mean "throw
21 some client projects on and pray).
22
23 ;)
24
25 --
26 Eric Sammer
27 eric@××××××××××××.com
28 http://www.ineoconcepts.com
29
30
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list