1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 11:17, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: |
5 |
> From a user perspective I don't see anything wrong with the way |
6 |
> KEYWORDS are handled currently. |
7 |
|
8 |
i was looking at this from a developer point of view ... in the end neither |
9 |
solution (existing or new) would affect the end users |
10 |
|
11 |
> However, if you must make a change please don't use a keyword as casual |
12 |
> and mocking as 'pleasebreakme'. Make it something distinct like |
13 |
> 'unstable' or something. Just some thoughts. |
14 |
|
15 |
i was using it as an example, but i like it ;) |
16 |
- -mike |
17 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
18 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
19 |
|
20 |
iQIVAwUBPyhI9kFjO5/oN/WBAQJ3ng//TzJke2aI0b4+bWJ/6cx//34djJyJ96V/ |
21 |
df67mTFW3I/Tpn3kN7M1neuo6BXzWOwucSX2znDekqj5H+287QY+oL9hSYCHoXk+ |
22 |
v1arEn/LGSPGCPOZoJID6YwvSIDcKJJOKaaq0k7ToEfmWUw9iASBb9BqgUuy9FXV |
23 |
paH0hV/iNmbjpNShtNAl2NkHyA/MQnn/bXMLVqZTIlwo1ARlj9xodjtPt/A/P5+E |
24 |
nQ451v74O1Qe7TnWwqZXaaUDKyWkxn3sfvcS8lpdbIo4Zh3dA8NweknTHtogw5h5 |
25 |
STOhSEXgI15DaB4AmQK68HTxm5h/ShvGpv+OM8DT/LV/XQOeZGQg1oyoZ4uCukzv |
26 |
Ve0BqQWeGonO0VnPDqoALCawGhnI2n/+yKwBIZ8yVHhhHADUo/waRClxXU2McWBe |
27 |
d54g2a7VJrednpgjEodUs48AJf0vNWjomvkoxpXlk5Vz/7I4JvXay1RSBOqbcGZr |
28 |
/xUdP7VDq46c+ge+K4jNvLgfMRCdeb2P2JjR6FkoQY7cQFMnmi4s54lwwoHVMXiZ |
29 |
6VjE4iU1remOpWONPv5aCpP6+Q1QO9MQCfJtd6vI8f0n1v3qnXW1gffM+q1ZznKm |
30 |
+5iFzqMa5XsGIfLijWiidsHIQEUK1Ao+xoycHUbynKoeMp7BX8Sw3RlaZj2Ifjmm |
31 |
BNfj11jLCBM= |
32 |
=YrDm |
33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |