1 |
On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:09:58 +0200 |
2 |
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Dne čtvrtek 14 Květen 2009 20:39:07 Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): |
4 |
> > Where on earth are you getting the idea that GLEP 55 makes things |
5 |
> > slower? The only difference to the code with GLEP 55 is in checking |
6 |
> > file extensions against a slightly larger set of strings, which is |
7 |
> > nowhere near a measurable increase in anything. You're claiming that |
8 |
> > checking for a suffix of either ".ebuild-4" or ".ebuild" against a |
9 |
> > fixed string is in any way relevant, which is obviously trolling. |
10 |
> Read the block once more, he is not stating that adding suffix to the |
11 |
> filename is slower. |
12 |
|
13 |
He is stating that GLEP 55 makes things slower. I quote: |
14 |
|
15 |
"so with glep55 caching it is actually slower!" |
16 |
|
17 |
The only possible change to GLEP 55 performance-wise is in the file |
18 |
name recognition, and that's so obviously not an issue that there's no |
19 |
way anyone can take it seriously. |
20 |
|
21 |
Unless you seriously think he's claiming that GLEP 55 does away with the |
22 |
need for storing EAPI in metadata cache, which is even more obviously |
23 |
nonsense... |
24 |
|
25 |
Either way, he's trolling and needs to be called on it. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Ciaran McCreesh |