Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: perl@g.o, patrick@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] About perl-5.18 unmasking
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 12:58:52
Message-Id: 522C74F4.3020905@gentoo.org
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi guys!
5
6 Few days ago i was surprised, when i saw perl-5.18 unhardmasked.
7 So, i want ask here.
8
9
10 @Patrick, why you unmask it? You even not ack perl herd about it. It was
11 in the tree about two weeks, too early for unmasking, furthermore, you
12 added not all modules need for perl-5.18 in the tree. Now many users ask
13 us "why perl 5.18 broke our modules?" Its not good. Testing on three
14 boxes w/o problems, no major reason for unmasking. And also, many CPAN
15 guys still no fix own modules for compile with-5.18
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iJwEAQECAAYFAlIsdO0ACgkQG9wOWsQutdat/QQAsLcbqEn6NZGFAoipWZuBCxMM
20 Q5BPj7a43vLEuI08aCbOeiihVWqEEVqPOWJyXAoSohkOL5DhmRfv1e6z4JPX2BGv
21 dH/HFBkFtWH3gVOg7BV+rvecSb/ds6M2zufjnSHfBxomAuSKiFru1lQGYoVbPOrZ
22 Gwpy66uY2LZ9kBNkM/Q=
23 =USUZ
24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] About perl-5.18 unmasking Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>