| 1 |
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 17:59, Douglas Russell wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> While fixing a bug it came to my attention that when an ebuild may wish to |
| 6 |
> strip off CFLAGS known not to work, it will have to either strip off |
| 7 |
> unnecessarily large amounts of optimisations or run the risk of being |
| 8 |
> incompatible with different versions of gcc. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> For example, if removing -finline-functions from -O3, the optimal result with |
| 11 |
> gcc 3 or greater is -O2 -frename-functions. However, gcc versions less than 3 |
| 12 |
> have no -frename-functions and will hence fail. Either dropping all the way |
| 13 |
> down to -O2 unnecessarily on some systems or some conditional statements are |
| 14 |
> required. The latter is obviously desirable to maximise optimisations. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Rather than have conditional statements for every possible connotation of gcc |
| 17 |
> in the ebuild however, I have written this addition to the flag-o-matic |
| 18 |
> eclass which basically queries gcc for each of the used optimisations and |
| 19 |
> strips the unsupported ones. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Attached is a patch for the flag-o-matic eclass. Any feedback or suggestions |
| 22 |
> would be appreciated. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
What about: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
CFLAGS="-O3 -fno-inline-functions" |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
rather ? =) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Cheers, |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Martin Schlemmer |
| 37 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer |
| 38 |
Cape Town, South Africa |
Archives