| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:34:42 +0300 Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o> |
| 4 |
>wrote: |
| 5 |
>| IMO, www-proxy should be renamed to net-proxy, for allowing me to move |
| 6 |
>| various SOCKS packages into it. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>Were you, hypothetically, to do this, remember to update the categories |
| 9 |
>and updates file in such a way that cvs->rsync doesn't kick in whilst |
| 10 |
>you're in the middle of the move. Because you wouldn't want to break the |
| 11 |
>tree now, would you? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
I've done it in following manner: |
| 16 |
- add & commit the new net-proxy category |
| 17 |
- update profiles with s/www-proxy/net-proxy/g |
| 18 |
- changed dependancies of other ebuilds to net-proxy |
| 19 |
- removed www-proxy |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Sorry if it took too long. I had a problem with repoman. Since creation |
| 22 |
of metadata.xml at category level, it wants to create |
| 23 |
metadata.xml/Manifest... |
| 24 |
I will fill a bug about it |
Archives