| 1 |
On Thursday 18 May 2006 15:49, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 2 |
> Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Unfortunately this GLEP has not been implemented yet. This eclass |
| 4 |
> > would indeed be an ideal elib. Also, for this eclass the API |
| 5 |
> > requirements are not as strict as it is only intended to be used in |
| 6 |
> > unpack and compile stages. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That's not my point. I mentioned it because it briefly shows why the |
| 9 |
> current eclass system has its problems and why contacting -dev *before* |
| 10 |
> adding a new eclass to the tree is essential. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I see your point. This GLEP does not require contacting -dev at all |
| 13 |
though. Instead of this eclass I could have abused the db4fix eclass and |
| 14 |
be done with it. The new one has a better name, and sane design. It |
| 15 |
offers functions (and will offer more) that are long due and actually |
| 16 |
help ebuilds using berkeley db. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paul |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 23 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 24 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives