* [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW
@ 2016-06-16 12:26 99% Michał Górny
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Michał Górny @ 2016-06-16 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: bugzilla
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 869 bytes --]
Hello, everyone.
Here's my second RFC wrt bugs.gentoo.org redesign.
Right now we have separate UNCONFIRMED and CONFIRMED states for bugs.
However, we use the two scarcely. I believe it would be beneficial to
replace the two with a single NEW state.
Rationale:
1. Most of developers don't care about the two states, and which one
bugs are in.
2. All bugs need to be handled the same, whether they were marked as
confirmed or not.
3. We stage bugs through bug-wranglers@ which kinda has a similar
purpose to the UNCONFIRMED state in other Bugzillas.
4. Some people who actually care about the two states change them,
causing unnecessary bugspam.
5. Some users who think that the state matters get furious about bugs
staying in UNCONFIRMED for long.
Your thoughts?
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 949 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2016-06-16 12:26 99% [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW Michał Górny
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox