| 1 |
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:26:03 +0200 |
| 2 |
Denys Duchier <Denys.Duchier@×××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> writes: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > anoncvs has been killed due to the fact that it killed cvs speeds :) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I can see that "emerge rsync" should not use cvs to update a user's |
| 9 |
> portage tree (given the large user-base and the uneconomical cvs |
| 10 |
> protocol)... but does anoncvs have to be turned off entirely? if yes, |
| 11 |
> can't anything else be done (e.g. also rsyncing the gentoo-src part)? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Sorry for being such a pain; blame it on Gentoo being too fascinating |
| 14 |
> for its own good :-) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'm sure somebody will be more then happy to mirror the CVS for anon use somewhere so that it does not effect the developers .. and anon has access to CVS |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Henti |
Archives