| 1 |
On 20/10/14 00:53, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi everyone, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I debated about whether to write a news item about c++11 abi. Usually |
| 5 |
> our news items are about some change which requires user intervention. |
| 6 |
> But this is just precautionary. With more packages needing c++11 |
| 7 |
> because of source changes, we may want to inform users about breakage at |
| 8 |
> the ABI level in case they do something like add -std=c++11 to their |
| 9 |
> global CXXFLAGS. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Let me know if you think its worth sending out and/or any other |
| 12 |
> suggestions. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Shorter form: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Since gcc-4.7 there is a -std=c++11 option, do not use it since it |
| 17 |
breaks the ABI, resulting in a non-functional system. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
lu |
Archives