1 |
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:43:14 -0500 |
3 |
> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > this eclass is an alternative to systemd.eclass, and maintains |
6 |
> > full compatibility with it; however, it expands it so that it can query |
7 |
> > pkgconfig for the directory paths. It returns the same default paths as |
8 |
> > systemd.eclass if there is an error with pkgconfig. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Alternative? So now developers decide whether they want support systemd |
11 |
> A or systemd B? And we fork packages so that users can have matching |
12 |
> set of packages? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> If you listened, you would know that the only reason I didn't apply |
15 |
> your patches to the eclass was that nothing used them. If you really |
16 |
> want to commit your quasi-fork, I will update the eclass. You |
17 |
> don't really have to play silly games like this. |
18 |
|
19 |
Ok, that is the better aproach anyway, go ahead and update the eclass. |
20 |
|
21 |
Thanks much. :-) |
22 |
|
23 |
William |