1 |
Olivier Crête wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>uOn Sat, 2005-12-03 at 01:01 +0100, Ernst Herzberg wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>dev-util/esvn: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>0.6.8-r1 was masked, and has some crazy bugs, that this stuff is not usable |
9 |
>>for an 'enduser'. If you select an 'working directory', the last character of |
10 |
>>the path get lost. You have to create a workspace, select there a working |
11 |
>>directory, add the last character by hand.... |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>OkOk, as long as this stuff is masked, no problem. BUT: Upstream has released |
14 |
>>a new version with this bug fixed. Why went the buggy version stable? And the |
15 |
>>new with the bug fixed version is masked? That make no sense to me. |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>>Can somebody explain that? |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> |
21 |
>Maybe you should ask MrNess... But he doesn't seem to think that testing |
22 |
>is important... |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
This package I happen to use at work, I could say I did more than a |
27 |
simple test. |
28 |
Do you suggest that, if this bug is real, I should know about? |
29 |
Do you understand that tests don't always detect bugs, right? |