1 |
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 06:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Their commit history backs it up all by itself. |
4 |
|
5 |
Ppint to specifically what, in their respective histories, proves your |
6 |
case. This is like pulling teeth. |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
> | Where is this code being pushed to, exactly? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Users. |
12 |
|
13 |
Please note the difference between pulling and pushing. Pushing implies |
14 |
that people who don't want sunrise on their systems have to have it and |
15 |
have to use it. This is not the case. So, again, where is this code |
16 |
being *pushed* to, exactly? |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
> The correct way to push through a large change is part of the developer |
20 |
> quiz. There's no excuse for anyone not knowing it. |
21 |
|
22 |
Was it really a *large change* that they pushed through? They haven't |
23 |
altered the way anybody does things. Any developer or user going about |
24 |
their normal business does not even have to *think* about sunrise. Not |
25 |
that large a change, after all. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
> Would you fly in a plane being piloted by Britney Spears? |
29 |
|
30 |
What do I care what the pilot's name is? And how is that relevant to |
31 |
the discussion, when you've yet to actually show why any of the Sunrise |
32 |
staff is unfit. |
33 |
|
34 |
Furthermore, there were other questions I asked that you completely |
35 |
removed from your reply. Please answer those as well. |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> |
40 |
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |