| 1 |
On 04/24/2013 07:21 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks |
| 4 |
>> with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run |
| 7 |
> by a CI system hooked up to the Gerrit instance that developers push to. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So, let me get this straight ... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
$now: Developer A makes a change to automake |
| 12 |
$now+10min: Change is pushed to CI |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
... |
| 15 |
... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
$now + 2 weeks: Initial testrun done, 734 potential issues found |
| 19 |
(and 2 weeks is a pretty generous optimistic estimate) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
$now + 4 weeks: Triaging and 50% fixing done |
| 23 |
$now + 8 weeks: Developer forgot about the issue while going on vacation |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
$now + 12 weeks: Developer B, unaware of the prior work, pushes the same |
| 26 |
change again and waits 2 weeks too |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
etc. etc. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Anything else is IMO waste of developers' time and minds. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
At least your idea is completely unrelated to reality and a waste of |
| 33 |
developer's time and minds, but thanks for bringing up something |
| 34 |
completely silly again. |
Archives