| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 09:14:30AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> You know, usually it's enough to ping upstream. AFAIR there was |
| 4 |
> a similar problem in irqbalance, and they have added plain |
| 5 |
> '--foreground' for us. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I don't know there really is an upstream for portable openntpd right |
| 8 |
now, there's been forward development in the openbsd tree, but the last |
| 9 |
official release of the portable version was in 2006 8-/. Unless you |
| 10 |
consider debian upstream as far as their patches on top of vanilla |
| 11 |
portable. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I'm not sure what all's changed in the openbsd version, but I guess no |
| 14 |
one's really cared enough to work on making it portable. The last status |
| 15 |
I see is from 2008: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=122731899504602 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
where someone said it would be "nontrivial". |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I think adding a pid option would be better than adding a foreground |
| 22 |
option, at least for openrc purposes; although a foreground option that |
| 23 |
wasn't debugging mode and still logged to syslog would be better than |
| 24 |
the current gentoo state. |
Archives