| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò |
| 2 |
<flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 22/09/2012 18:54, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I'd like to add multilib USE flags to Mesa and thus its dependencies. |
| 5 |
>> I realized that almost everything in x11-libs/ could be converted very |
| 6 |
>> easily, which would allow us to get rid of emul-linux-x86-xlibs in |
| 7 |
>> addition to emul-linux-x86-opengl. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If that's the case, please consider a more broad strategy, in particular: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> - unforce the multilib flag for the packages that are _built_ for multilib; |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
In progress: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435094 :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> - make 32-bit binary packages depend amd64? ( whatever[multilib] ) |
| 16 |
> instead of blanketing all xlibs. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I think this means "make 32-bit binary packages' dependencies on amd64 |
| 19 |
not use the emul- packages"? If so, that'd certainly be a component of |
| 20 |
getting rid of emul-linux-x86-xlibs. It's not in the scope of my |
| 21 |
project to get rid of /all/ of the emul- packages, but I agree that |
| 22 |
that is a worthwhile goal. |
Archives