| 1 |
Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:15:57 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I'd really like to unmask gcc-4.4.1 soon, as in the next week or so. |
| 6 |
>> If you could please install it and test it out, I would appreciate it. |
| 7 |
>> Also, if you have any gcc 4.4 porting bugs assigned to a herd that you |
| 8 |
>> are a part of, resolving those bugs would help a lot. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Thanks to all that have contributed and helped already, |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Also the glibc-2.10 tracker, a lot of which are triggered by the combination |
| 14 |
> of it and gcc-4.4. I admit to massive slacking getting these fixed (mostly |
| 15 |
> due to my job sending me to the middle of nowhere for three weeks last month, |
| 16 |
> but also Persona 4 (oh that wacky Teddie)). |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=270353&hide_resolved=1 |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'd say what is left unfixed in both trackers gets a CC to treecleaners |
| 22 |
in a week or so. Doesn't make sense to keep pkgs that won't build in tree. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-Samuli |
Archives