| 1 |
All, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the |
| 4 |
tree. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
The first is in a package I maintain and several others in the tree -- |
| 7 |
using the zsh-completion use flag along with an rdepend on |
| 8 |
app-shells/zsh behind the use flag. The package I maintain that does |
| 9 |
this is www-client/pybugz, but you will find several other packages |
| 10 |
doing the same thing. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several |
| 13 |
other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions |
| 14 |
according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting |
| 15 |
the rdepend on app-shells/zsh. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think we should be consistent with how we handle this, and personally |
| 18 |
I would vote for the first way since zsh is not all that common. |
| 19 |
However, if the feeling is that we should nuke the zsh-completion use |
| 20 |
flag, I'll be the first to do it, and I'll start opening bugs against |
| 21 |
other packages. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Comments/discussion are welcome. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
William |
Archives