| 1 |
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 01:33, C. Brewer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hmm, I'm confused...I thought the original plan was for iputils to replace |
| 3 |
> netkit-base.. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
it did ... netkit-base provided 'ping' and 'inetd' ... iputils replaced the |
| 6 |
ping part while xinetd replaced the inetd part |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Also I hope this is only a change to satisfy a virtual/inetd |
| 9 |
> and not a mandatory system package? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
like all virtuals, the default is xinetd, but you are not required to use |
| 12 |
xinetd ... thats why it's called a virtual ... |
| 13 |
if you have netkit-base emerged and not xinetd, then you shouldnt have xinetd |
| 14 |
pulled in |
| 15 |
-mike |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives