| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 19:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:52:33 -0400 Chris Gianelloni |
| 3 |
> <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | > Uhm, if the ebuild submitter does not choose a category, then we'd |
| 5 |
> | > have to change the subject ourselves (and sometimes I'm not even |
| 6 |
> | > remotely sure into which category would the particular ebuild fit). |
| 7 |
> | |
| 8 |
> | Try asking the submitter? *grin* |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Yeah, I reckon we could stick a rough category in the title before we |
| 11 |
> tag stuff as REVIEWED. Sometimes it might end up as games-?/whatever |
| 12 |
> rather than a full category though. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That would be fine. In fact, it would be fine if it were just |
| 15 |
*somewhere* in the bug report, except for the automated message you're |
| 16 |
going to be sending out would be much more useful if it were in the |
| 17 |
summary, even if it is just a rough idea. Remember that not |
| 18 |
*everything* will need the summary there right away, since not every |
| 19 |
request for clarification will be immediately answered, but increasing |
| 20 |
the likelihood of the category being there increases the likelihood of |
| 21 |
the package being picked up. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 25 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
| 26 |
Games - Developer |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives