Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 22:37:38
Message-Id: 20051102223443.042bae23@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting by "Jan Kundrát"
1 On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:33:37 +0100 Jan Kundrát <jkt@g.o> wrote:
2 | "Once this tool is implemented and well tested it can be integrated
3 | into portage."
4
5 can ! will. It might, but don't count on it.
6
7 | GLSA already contains stuff for marking items as valid only for given
8 | systems, for "injecting" them etc. Why don't use existing code? Why
9 | duplication?
10
11 Because it's quicker to invent a wheel which is actually round.
12
13 | > You think XML magically makes things compatible? Then I suggest you
14 | > write a GuieXML to Docbook conversion tool, and see how many
15 | > thousand lines of XSLT it takes. All XML does is move the
16 | > conversion and parsing problems to a different, more complex level.
17 |
18 | I'm not familiar with DocBook, but I doubt I'll need thousands of
19 | lines of code.
20
21 Oh? Our GuideXML to HTML conversion is thousands of lines of code...
22
23 --
24 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
25 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
26 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting Xavier Neys <neysx@g.o>