1 |
Davide Cendron wrote: |
2 |
>> Ok, so we're just blocking on the docs guys. |
3 |
|
4 |
Well, to the best of my knowledge, nobody asked us to fix stuff. |
5 |
Preferred way would be filing a bug to the docs-team that says "hey, |
6 |
we're gonna deprecate all digests, could you please fix your crap so |
7 |
that it doesn't recommend running `ebuild foo digest`?", but other |
8 |
methods like mailing the -dev ML or pinging us on irc are fine, too. |
9 |
|
10 |
If you don't want to be held back by our inactivity, you have to let us |
11 |
know :). |
12 |
|
13 |
Also note that docs team is responsible for files that are under |
14 |
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/ and *nothing else*. If there's a bug in some |
15 |
other document that is on our web nodes, like for example the Devrel |
16 |
Handbook, we leave it to their maintainers (devrel here) to fix it. If |
17 |
such team says "hey, fell free to fix whatever you want", I'm sure some |
18 |
GDP members (including rane myself) will gladly help, but right now, the |
19 |
policy is "we got a bug that speaks about stuff under /proj/ -> reassign". |
20 |
|
21 |
(As a side note, we have that great devmanual which seems a lot more |
22 |
useful than the ebuild part of the devrel handbook, perhaps it's time to |
23 |
reconsider their roles. And yeah, I've brought this to devrel's |
24 |
attention and don't count on them following -dev :). ) |
25 |
|
26 |
> I don't know exactly how many other docs must be changed accordingly, it's |
27 |
> better to ping some GDP member to get a better feedback. |
28 |
|
29 |
Quick grep suggests that these needs fixing: |
30 |
|
31 |
proj/en/desktop/games/games-ebuild-HOWTO.txt |
32 |
proj/en/devrel/handbook/hb-guide-ebuild.xml |
33 |
proj/en/devrel/handbook/hb-introduction-new-devs.xml |
34 |
proj/en/devrel/new-dev-training.xml |
35 |
|
36 |
I'm sure that rane will get someone from the devrel to fix them :) |
37 |
|
38 |
Cheers, |
39 |
-jkt |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |