| 1 |
On 19.08.2015 18:33, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is |
| 3 |
> practically useless. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> If there has been a problem with a commit, ask the developer about his |
| 6 |
> repoman version (which I believe was the reason for this, unless you |
| 7 |
> want me to add "Package-Manager: paludis-2.4.0" to every commit ;). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Let's just remove it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
With that line removed, how do we notice that people are committing |
| 13 |
without repoman or not running repoman checks at least? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
There is quite a risk of things going straight into stable by mistake |
| 16 |
when repoman is not used. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Best, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Sebastian |
Archives