Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Michael <fedora.dm0@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] acct-group.eclass: declare the missing dependency on shadow
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 13:48:20
Message-Id: CAEvUa7=-vQzhQ-KaX9+UduQX0Ea-cas97AfnYqnpYG-hCaBSUg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] acct-group.eclass: declare the missing dependency on shadow by Alexis Ballier
1 On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:37 AM Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:54:14 -0400
3 > David Michael <fedora.dm0@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 > > Hi,
6 > >
7 > > This fix might not be so straightforward. A configuration I tested
8 > > hit a dependency loop with shadow -> pambase -> systemd -> a bunch of
9 > > groups -> shadow. It is possible to bootstrap around by emerging
10 > > shadow with no USE flags first, but I don't know how acceptable it is
11 > > to introduce new dep loops like this.
12 >
13 > what happens without your change ?
14
15 Someone reported an issue in https://bugs.gentoo.org/720948 that
16 showed shadow and groups are not ordered during installation. I am
17 not sure what environment produced those symptoms since I never
18 encountered it, but you can rage-clean shadow and a group, delete the
19 group, then reinstall it to reproduce the problem.
20
21 Thanks.
22
23 David

Replies