| 1 |
Petteri Räty a écrit : |
| 2 |
> What do you think about adding support to base.eclass for running |
| 3 |
> eautoreconf? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
*puts on Gnome hat* |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
In most of the ebuilds where we need to run eautoreconf, we usually |
| 8 |
apply patches. I can't remember of an ebuild where we just run |
| 9 |
eautoreconf on its own. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
In the end, that won't help us at all (which is no reason not to have |
| 12 |
this :) ) but I'm afraid that adding options for semi-hidden stuff can |
| 13 |
come and bite us later, as we add more and more of those. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Cheers, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Rémi |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives