Archives
Archives
| From: | Matthew Walker <mwalker@×××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:28:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4874.216.190.203.130.1040084798.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? by foser |
||
| 1 | foser said: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > And i'm not sure it's a good idea to stabilize top packages while some of |
| 4 | > it's -needed- deps are still masked testing, i mean this will break |
| 5 | > things like -u world won't it ? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Yes, it would, currently. However, this is just an indication that portage |
| 8 | needs to skip updates that it can not satisfy the dependencies of, and |
| 9 | continue with the update instead of just dying. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Matthew |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Was I helpful? Let others know: |
| 15 | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=utoxin&p=main |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo "stable" going in wrong direction ? | foser <foser@×××××××××××××.net> |