| 1 |
On 2 October 2011 13:50, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/02/2011 02:44 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 3 |
[...] |
| 4 |
>> Bug 361181 is certainly on my TODO list, just not very high up to now. |
| 5 |
>> If you think that there is some urgency in getting rid of the package, |
| 6 |
>> please do explain so in advance. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The time ran out with opening of http://bugs.gentoo.org/384733 for |
| 9 |
> linux-headers reverse deps to be tracked stable. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I've removed qutecom for you again. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Removing the package again seems to just be unnecessary when the |
| 14 |
maintainer has stated that he'll fix the problem. Would masking it |
| 15 |
till it was fixed not suffice? Seems like a bit unjustified to me |
| 16 |
(from information on this thread alone). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Cheers, |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Arun Raghavan |
| 21 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
| 22 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |
Archives