1 |
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:04:06 -0600 |
2 |
William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like what I |
5 |
> see. |
6 |
|
7 |
I've still only read the documentation but I agree with your |
8 |
assessment. It's nice to hear something positive about a build system |
9 |
for once. |
10 |
|
11 |
> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja as |
12 |
> build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system where |
13 |
> we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or portability) |
14 |
> outweighs that. |
15 |
|
16 |
I don't see those as a problem. I suspect it's only a matter of time |
17 |
before something else in @system pulls those in. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
James Le Cuirot (chewi) |
21 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |