| 1 |
On 1/8/21 5:42 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I wonder how you composed this list. If you just checked if there is |
| 5 |
> any revdep, the check was probably useless: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> For example, |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> dev-libs/cyberjack |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> is up-to-date, has an active dev as maintainer and is required for any |
| 12 |
> ReinerSCT chipcard reader. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
Hey, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I admit the motivation didn't come clear from the first post. I believe |
| 18 |
majority of listed packages to be leftovers from previous removals, thus |
| 19 |
being "useless" to us now. I also admit to checking git logs for only a |
| 20 |
handful of packages, and left few active+useful ones out from the list |
| 21 |
already. This is a genuine inquiry to find out if these libs are somehow |
| 22 |
useful for someone, not a "last-rites call for action" post ;) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Although I probably will continue to look for the really outdated, |
| 25 |
EAPI-5 etc ones after a certain period of time. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- juippis |
Archives