Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Tandy <tarpman@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Pending Removal of $KV | ||
| Date: | Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:38:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4497349F.4070608@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Pending Removal of $KV by "Arek (James Potts)" |
||
| 1 | Arek (James Potts) wrote: |
| 2 | > If they don't actually build against the kernel, |
| 3 | > couldn't/shouldn't they look at either kernel-headers or the output of |
| 4 | > `uname -r`? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Kernel headers being the virtual/linux-headers dependency that Georgi |
| 7 | mentioned. `uname -r` works, but is annoying because you can't build |
| 8 | for a kernel other than the one you're running. |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Pending Removal of $KV | infowolfe <infowolfe@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Pending Removal of $KV | Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> |